Facing allegations of misrepresentation can be one of the most stressful experiences in the Canadian immigration process. Whether intentional or not, providing incorrect or incomplete information on your immigration application can lead to serious consequences, including being found inadmissible for misrepresentation and potentially removed from Canada. The impact on your status, ability to enter Canada, and future opportunities can be devastating.
If you’ve received a Procedural Fairness Letter (PFL) or are concerned about potential misrepresentation issues, acting quickly is essential. Without proper legal guidance, you risk a five-year ban, denial of permanent residence, revocation of status, or even a removal order.
Our inadmissability to Canada lawyer will help you manage these complex situations and fight for your right to remain in or return to Canada.
Misrepresentation in Canadian immigration refers to providing false information, withholding material facts, or submitting fraudulent documentation that could induce an error in the administration of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). Under Section 40 of IRPA, misrepresentation includes both direct falsehoods and omissions of relevant information.
Importantly, misrepresentation can be either intentional or unintentional. Even if you didn’t know the misrepresentation occurred, you could still be found at fault – even honest mistakes can lead to serious consequences. This includes situations where a family member, representative, or consultant provided incorrect information on your behalf.
💡 The Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) evaluates misrepresentation based on whether the information provided (or omitted) could potentially affect the processing of your application—not just whether it actually did.
Knowing what constitutes misrepresentation helps you avoid these obstacles in your immigration journey. Here are common examples that can trigger inadmissibility findings:
💡 Even minor omissions can lead to severe consequences. For example, a permanent resident who failed to disclose a three-day hospitalization on a medical form was found inadmissible despite the condition being fully resolved and having no ongoing health implications.
The consequences of misrepresentation in Canada vary depending on your immigration status but are universally grave. Knowing these potential outcomes is essential when determining how to proceed with your case.
Comparison of consequences by immigration status:
Status | Immediate Consequences | Long-term Impact | Appeal Rights |
---|---|---|---|
Visitor/Worker/Student | Immediate refusal, possible removal if in Canada | 5-year ban from any application | Limited to judicial review |
Permanent Resident | Potential loss of PR status, removal order | 5-year ban after removal | Appeal to IAD (some exceptions) |
Citizenship Applicant | Application denial | Continued PR status but citizenship barriers | Reconsideration request, judicial review |
Refugee Claimant | Claim may be rejected | Removal from Canada | RAD or Federal Court (depending on country) |
Appeal options for misrepresentation findings exist but vary significantly depending on your immigration status. Knowing the correct appeal path is critical to challenging an adverse decision effectively and avoiding further delays or complications.
Additional reading: how to overcome inadmissibility due to misrepresentation in Canada
When facing allegations of misrepresentation, a strategic and thorough response is essential. Here’s how to effectively challenge such findings:
A strong reconsideration request should present new evidence not previously available or demonstrate that the decision-maker overlooked critical information that could affect the outcome of your case.
At Kingwell Immigration Law, we understand the complexity and high stakes involved in misrepresentation cases. Our immigration law firm offers comprehensive support throughout this challenging process:
💡 Case Highlight: In a recent case, we represented a refugee claimant from Albania who had been fighting his case for a decade. The Minister argued he should be excluded from protection because of a criminal conviction. We successfully appealed the decision to the Federal Court on the basis that he was wrongfully convicted in his absence, and the Refugee Protection Division was ordered to redetermine his claim (Doresi v Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (2022 FC 1300)).
Whether you’re a permanent resident facing potential removal, a foreign national denied entry to Canada at the airport, at the border, or a citizenship applicant whose application has been refused, our team has the expertise to help you manage these challenging circumstances.
Book a consultation today or call us at (416) 988-8853 to get immediate help with your misrepresentation case.
After being found inadmissible for misrepresentation, you must wait five years from making an application to enter Canada before submitting a new permanent residency application. During this period, you may be able to request a Temporary Resident Permit for urgent situations, though these are granted only in exceptional circumstances with compelling reasons.
Upon receiving a PFL, it’s important to carefully address these allegations within the specified timeframe, typically 30 days. Contact our immigration lawyer immediately, as this is your opportunity to respond before a final decision. Do not ignore the letter or submit an incomplete response, as doing so will almost certainly result in a negative determination.
A misrepresentation ban prevents you from making an application to enter Canada for five years from the date of the final determination. For permanent residents, this five-year period begins after you’ve been removed from Canada. After the ban expires, you can apply again, but the previous finding may still affect the credibility assessment of future applications.
Yes, even unintentional errors can constitute misrepresentation if they could induce an error in the administration of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. However, honest mistakes made without intention to deceive may offer grounds to challenge the finding, especially if you can demonstrate the error was inadvertent and you’ve otherwise been forthcoming throughout the immigration process.
181 University Ave
Suite 2200
Toronto, ON
M5H 3M7
All content ©2022-2024 Kingwell Immigration Law. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.