Denied Entry to Canada Lawyer

Overview

Being turned away at the Canadian border disrupts travel plans, damages business opportunities, and separates families, often creating long-lasting complications that affect every aspect of your life. Whether you’re facing criminal inadmissibility, misrepresentation allegations, or medical concerns, the consequences extend far beyond a single denied entry, making it crucial to work with a denied entry to Canada lawyer at Kingwell Immigration Law who can help you understand your options and protect your future.

Our Toronto immigration lawyer team helps clients resolve inadmissibility issues and restore their ability to enter Canada. Contact our lawyers at 416.988.8853 for immediate guidance.

★★★★★

Immigration Guidance That Changes Lives

We solve immigration challenges with experience, care, and proven results

Book Personalized Legal Help

Table of Contents

Common Reasons for Being Denied Entry to Canada.

A criminal record—even from decades ago—can make you inadmissible to Canada. CBSA officers have access to extensive databases that flag past convictions, including DUI charges, assault, theft, drug possession, and fraud. Many U.S. citizens discover at the border that offences considered minor in the United States carry serious consequences under Canadian law.

Expunged or pardoned convictions may still affect your admissibility, as Canadian immigration law applies its own assessment criteria. Officers evaluate the Canadian equivalent of your foreign offence, not the original charge. A misdemeanour DUI in the U.S., for instance, can equate to a hybrid or indictable offence in Canada, resulting in automatic inadmissibility.

Providing false information or omitting material facts on immigration applications leads to serious consequences. Misrepresentation includes deliberately lying about criminal history, work experience, or relationships, but it also covers unintentional errors or omissions. Even honest mistakes can result in a five-year ban from entering Canada.

CBSA takes misrepresentation extremely seriously because it undermines the integrity of Canada’s immigration system. Officers may discover discrepancies through database checks, interviews, or documentation reviews. Once misrepresentation is established, you face an inadmissibility finding that prevents entry for five years from the date of the decision.

Canada may deny entry to individuals whose health conditions could endanger public health or create excessive demand on health and social services. This category typically affects those applying for permanent residence rather than temporary visitors, but CBSA officers can refuse entry if they identify communicable diseases or serious health concerns at the border.

Medical inadmissibility assessments consider the nature of the condition, treatment requirements, and potential costs to Canada’s healthcare system. Our lawyers help clients understand whether their medical situation affects admissibility and guide them through the appropriate application process.

CBSA officers possess broad authority to deny entry based on security concerns, suspected immigration violations, or other factors. Officers may refuse entry to individuals they believe pose a security risk, have ties to criminal organisations, or intend to work without authorisation.

This discretionary power means that even without formal charges or convictions, travellers can be turned away. Officers assess credibility, review travel history, and evaluate the purpose of your visit. Inconsistencies in your story or documentation raise red flags that lead to entry denials.

What to Do if You’re Denied Entry at the Border

Facing a border refusal is stressful, but how you respond impacts your ability to resolve the situation. Taking the right steps immediately after being denied entry strengthens your position for future applications:

  • Stay calm and request documentation: Border officers should provide written reasons for your refusal. This documentation is vital for your lawyer to assess your case and develop a strategy. Ask for all paperwork, including the specific section of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) cited in your refusal.
  • Do not argue or provide additional information: Anything you say at the border can be documented and used in future proceedings. Politely accept the decision and avoid volunteering information that could complicate your situation further.
  • Retain legal representation immediately: Immigration law is complex, and the procedures for overcoming inadmissibility involve strict timelines and technical requirements. Our denied entry to Canada lawyers understand CBSA practices and IRCC procedures, allowing us to act quickly to protect your rights and explore remedies.
  • Preserve all documents: Keep your refusal letter, travel documents, and any correspondence with border officers. These materials form the foundation of your legal response and help your lawyer identify the most effective strategy.

If you’ve been turned away at the border, our lawyers can act quickly to assess your case and determine the appropriate remedy.

How Our Lawyers Help Resolve Canadian Inadmissibility

Kingwell Immigration Law brings over 20 years of experience guiding clients through complex inadmissibility cases. We provide comprehensive legal support that addresses both immediate travel needs and long-term solutions.

Our services include detailed analysis of your refusal reasons. We review the grounds for your inadmissibility, examine the evidence used against you, and identify any procedural errors or misapplications of law. This analysis reveals whether you have grounds to challenge the decision or need to pursue alternative remedies.

We prepare and submit Temporary Resident Permit applications for clients who need to enter Canada urgently despite being inadmissible. TRPs provide short-term permission to enter Canada for specific purposes such as business meetings, family emergencies, or medical treatment.

For those with criminal records, we handle Criminal Rehabilitation applications that permanently overcome inadmissibility. Once approved, rehabilitation removes the barrier to entry and allows you to travel to Canada freely without requiring additional permits.

When facing misrepresentation findings, we develop strategic responses that present evidence, address discrepancies, and argue for reconsideration. Our experience with Federal Court litigation means we understand how to build persuasive cases that withstand scrutiny.

We also provide border entry planning for clients with complex immigration histories. This proactive approach helps you avoid future refusals by ensuring proper documentation, addressing potential concerns before travel, and establishing a clear record of your admissibility.

Our lawyers represent clients before IRCC and CBSA, communicating on your behalf and advocating for favourable outcomes.

I reached out to Kingwell Immigration Law after receiving a Procedural Fairness Letter (PFL). Christian Julien and Christie were assigned to my case, and both did an outstanding job. Christian went above and beyond to clearly explain my situation and guide me through every step of the process. I always felt supported and truly listened to, as he addressed each and every concern and question I had.  Despite extremely short notice, Christian and Christie prepared and submitted a comprehensive response to my PFL amounting to hundreds of pages. As a result, my eTA remains approved. I am incredibly grateful for their dedication, professionalism, and unwavering support.

Anna Zheng

Exceptional & Empathetic Legal Support!
I’m incredibly grateful to Daniel Kingwell, Christie Chan, and the entire team at Kingwell, for their exceptional support and expertise. Their expertise, empathy, and prompt responses made a challenging process much easier. It was a pleasure working with such a knowledgeable and very supportive team—I highly recommend them! Diana L

Rogi Kale

I want to thank Christian Julien for the wonderful work he did for me and my family. He is a very intelligent, transparent and dedicated person in his work. Without a doubt, he is the best.

Merit Garcia

From the day my family and I started working with Christian Julian on our complicated immigration process, he has been humble, attentive and kind in dealing with our case. Christian is always responsive and goes above and beyond to help us understand the complicated immigration process and other regulations that had an impact on our case. With Christian, we always felt safe and very well taken care of! Our application for PR and then spousal sponsorship was processed with a great deal of attention to detail and extra care. The applications that were submitted were thorough and were never returned or delayed due to missing information/ documents or incorrectly filled forms. We cannot thank him enough for his diligence and professionalism!

I highly recommend Kingwell Immigration Law firm for any immigration-related legal representation anyone may require in Canada.

Nisan G. Woldeabzghi

Our immigration case was rather peculiar. But, having been introduced to Daniel Kingwell at a later stage in the process, we have had nothing but outstanding, professional help in all our legal matters. The knowledge of Mr. Kingwell regarding immigration matters is second to none, and his team is truly amazing. Not only is Mr. Kingwell’s knowledge and experience extremely extensive, but how he makes his clients feel at ease is beyond anything that we have had the experience of dealing with (having met a whole tranche of lawyers, I can safely testify to that). I would recommend Mr. Kingwell for all immigration-related matters.

Haseeb A Virk
Overcoming Criminal Inadmissibility.

A Temporary Resident Permit grants short-term permission to enter Canada despite criminal inadmissibility. TRPs suit travellers who need to enter Canada urgently for business, family emergencies, or other compelling reasons but don’t yet qualify for permanent solutions.

You must demonstrate that your need to enter Canada outweighs any risk you pose to Canadian society. Applications require detailed supporting documentation, including evidence of rehabilitation, character references, and proof of your purpose for travel. TRPs can be issued for single entries or multiple entries over a period of up to three years.

Processing times vary depending on where you apply. Applications submitted at the border receive immediate decisions, while applications filed at Canadian consulates or embassies abroad may take several months. Our lawyers help you determine the most strategic approach based on your timeline and circumstances.

Criminal Rehabilitation permanently resolves criminal inadmissibility by deeming you rehabilitated under Canadian immigration law. Once approved, you no longer require special permits to enter Canada and can travel freely.

Eligibility begins five years after completing all aspects of your sentence, including probation, parole, and payment of fines. The application process involves gathering extensive documentation, including court records, police certificates, and evidence of your conduct since the offence.

IRCC assesses your rehabilitation based on the severity of the offence, your behaviour since conviction, and whether you pose any risk to Canadian society. Our lawyers prepare thorough applications that present compelling evidence of rehabilitation and address any concerns IRCC might raise.

Facing a misrepresentation ban? Contact our team at for strategic legal guidance.

Establish Canadian Roots

Toronto Immigration Lawyer

  • 🇨🇦 Personalized Legal Support Across Canada
  • 📞 Urgent Assistance With Deportation & Applications
  • 🏛️ Trusted Immigration Representation
Book Now

Inadmissibility Due to Misrepresentation

Misrepresentation carries harsh consequences—a five-year ban from entering Canada starting from the date of the finding. This ban applies regardless of whether the misrepresentation was intentional or resulted from an honest mistake.

Common misrepresentation scenarios include failing to disclose a criminal record, providing false employment information, lying about relationship status, or omitting previous visa refusals. Officers may also find misrepresentation if they determine you misrepresented your intentions for travel, such as claiming to be a tourist when you actually intended to work.

Challenging a misrepresentation finding requires building a strong legal case that addresses the officer’s concerns and presents evidence supporting your position. We examine the circumstances surrounding the alleged misrepresentation, gather documentation that clarifies discrepancies, and argue for reconsideration based on procedural fairness or factual errors.

In some cases, we can demonstrate that any inconsistencies were unintentional mistakes rather than deliberate attempts to mislead immigration authorities. Where officers have made incorrect assumptions or failed to consider relevant evidence, we present arguments that challenge the misrepresentation finding.

Even where misrepresentation is established, legal options exist. After the five-year ban expires, we help clients prepare future applications that address the previous finding and demonstrate rehabilitation. We also explore whether Humanitarian and Compassionate considerations justify allowing entry despite the ban.

Denied Entry Due to Past Immigration Violations

Previous immigration violations create ongoing inadmissibility concerns that affect your ability to enter Canada. Common violations include overstaying your authorised period, working without proper authorisation, or being previously deported.

IRCC and CBSA maintain comprehensive records of immigration violations. Even if years have passed since a violation occurred, these records remain accessible to border officers and can result in entry denials. Officers may also refuse entry if you have a history of visa refusals or if they suspect you won’t comply with the terms of admission.

Overcoming inadmissibility based on past violations requires addressing the underlying issue and demonstrating that you will comply with Canadian immigration law going forward. Depending on your circumstances, this may involve applying for a TRP, seeking an Authorised Return to Canada (ARC), or pursuing a Humanitarian and Compassionate application.

Our lawyers assess your immigration history, identify the specific violations affecting your admissibility, and develop a plan to address these concerns. We advise on the proper sequence of applications and help you avoid actions that could further complicate your situation.

Legal planning before attempting re-entry is vital. Presenting yourself at the border without resolving underlying inadmissibility issues typically results in another refusal and creates additional negative immigration history.

Additional reading: Denied entry to Canada – Understanding the refusal process and your options.

Why Choose Our Denied Entry Lawyers​.

Kingwell Immigration Law’s experience with complex inadmissibility cases, including extensive Federal Court litigation, sets us apart from other immigration firms. While many firms handle routine applications, our practice focuses on difficult cases where others cannot find solutions.

Our Toronto immigration lawyer team understands how border officers make decisions, what evidence persuades IRCC, and how to navigate the technical requirements of inadmissibility applications.

When administrative remedies fail, we represent clients in Federal Court proceedings, challenging unreasonable decisions and establishing important legal precedents. Our litigation experience means we anticipate legal challenges and build stronger applications from the start.

We don’t apply one-size-fits-all solutions. Every case receives individualised attention, with strategies designed around your specific inadmissibility issues, travel needs, and long-term goals.

Many of our clients are U.S. citizens or residents facing inadmissibility due to U.S. criminal records. We understand how American legal concepts translate into Canadian immigration law and help clients navigate the differences between the two systems.

Immigration law is complex, but our explanations are straightforward. We keep you informed throughout the process, explain your options in plain language, and provide realistic assessments of your prospects.

Get Help from a Denied Entry to Canada Lawyer Today

Don’t let a border refusal derail your plans or separate you from family. Whether you need immediate help after being denied entry or want to resolve inadmissibility issues before travelling, our lawyers provide the strategic guidance and experienced representation you need.

We understand the urgency of border situations and act quickly to assess your options. Contact Kingwell Immigration Law to discuss your case and explore the remedies available to restore your ability to enter Canada.

Call us at 416.988.8853 or reach out through our contact page to schedule a consultation. Let our immigration lawyers help you overcome inadmissibility and reopen the door to Canada.

★★★★★

Immigration Guidance That Changes Lives

We solve immigration challenges with experience, care, and proven results

Book Personalized Legal Help

Common H&C Application Challenges Our Lawyers See

Years of experience handling humanitarian and compassionate applications have shown us recurring issues that can weaken cases or lead to refusals, allowing us to help clients avoid these common pitfalls.

  • Insufficient evidence of establishment in Canada: Many applicants underestimate the breadth of documentation needed to prove meaningful integration into Canadian society. Simply showing employment isn’t enough—successful applications demonstrate deep community ties, language development, professional growth, and social contributions that would be difficult to replicate elsewhere.
  • Weak or unsupported hardship arguments: Generic claims about poor conditions in one’s home country rarely succeed without specific, personalized evidence showing how the applicant would face unusual challenges beyond what others from that country typically experience. Successful hardship arguments require a detailed analysis of the applicant’s unique vulnerabilities.
  • Inadequate best interests of children analysis: Applications involving children often fail to provide comprehensive evidence of how removal would specifically harm each child’s physical, emotional, educational, and social development. Courts have emphasized that best interests analysis must be thorough and child-specific, not general.
  • Procedural fairness violations during processing: Immigration officers sometimes fail to provide adequate opportunity for applicants to respond to concerns about their applications. Recognizing and addressing procedural fairness issues requires experience with administrative law principles and IRCC’s duty to provide fair hearings.
  • Implicit bias affecting officer decision-making: Some officers may hold unconscious biases about certain countries, cultures, or circumstances that unfairly influence their assessment of H&C factors. Experienced lawyers know how to present cases in ways that minimize the impact of potential bias and focus attention on objective evidence.
  • Language barriers and cultural communication challenges: Applicants whose first language isn’t English or French may struggle to effectively communicate the nuances of their situations, leading to misunderstandings about their circumstances or the strength of their establishment in Canada. Professional legal representation ensures your story is told clearly and persuasively.

⚠️ These challenges highlight why self-representation in H&C cases is risky—the discretionary nature of these applications means that presentation and legal strategy can determine success or failure.

Past Cases.
After appealing to the Federal Court, PRRA applicants from Israel reconsidered.

Pre-Removal Risk Assessment applicants from Israel. The applicants claimed to be at risk as an Arab-Israeli LGBT couple. IRCC rejected their PRRA application. We successfully appealed the decision to the Federal Court on the basis that the officer had refused to consider a news report of an “honour killing” in their family. The Court ordered IRCC to reconsider the application.

Musa v Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (2012 FC 298)

A study permit applicant from Iran has application reconsidered by IRCC after an appeal to the Federal Court.

Study permit applicant from Iran. IRCC rejected her application finding that her study plan was not logical in light of her education history. We successfully appealed to the Federal Court, arguing that the reasons were insufficient to justify the decision, and the application was sent back to IRCC for reconsideration.

M.M. v Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (2022 FC 1098)

Refugee Protection Division ordered to redetermine refugee claim from Albania because of wrongful criminal conviction.

Refugee claimant from Albania. For a decade, he fought his case with the Minister at the Refugee Protection Division, who argued that he should be excluded from protection because of a criminal conviction. We successfully appealed the decision to the Federal Court on the basis that he was wrongfully convicted in his absence, and the RPD was ordered to redetermine his claim.

Doresi v Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (2022 FC 1300)

Study Permit application from Albania reconsidered by IRCC after appeals to the Federal Court.

Citizen from Albania applying for a study permit. IRCC rejected it, stating that her study plan was not reasonable given her education history. She requested reconsideration which IRCC also rejected. We appealed both decisions to the Federal Court and overturned the rejection, the Court agreeing that the officer had ignored her explanation that the course of studies was more specialized than her previous education and necessary for her career advancement. IRCC was required to reconsider her study permit application.

D.G. v Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (2021 FC 1468)

Conjugal partner PR application rejected by IAD returned to IRCC for processing after appeal to the Federal Court.

Overseas sponsorship of conjugal partner from Saudi Arabia. IRCC refused the application on the basis that they did not meet the requirements of conjugal partnership, and the Immigration Appeal Division rejected their appeal. We represented them on appeal to the Federal Court, and the judge overturned the decision, agreeing that the officer and IAD had improperly considered their individual and relationship histories. Their PR application was returned to IRCC for processing.

A.H. v Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (2020 FC 530)

FAQs

Can I enter Canada with a DUI?

A DUI conviction makes you criminally inadmissible to Canada under current immigration law. However, you may still enter through a Temporary Resident Permit, which provides short-term permission for urgent travel needs like business meetings or family emergencies. After five years from completing your sentence, you can apply for Criminal Rehabilitation, which permanently resolves the inadmissibility. Both applications require substantial documentation and legal preparation. Consulting an immigration lawyer significantly improves your chances of approval.

The duration depends entirely on the inadmissibility type. Misrepresentation bans last five years from the decision date. Criminal inadmissibility continues indefinitely until you obtain Criminal Rehabilitation or receive a record suspension in Canada. Medical inadmissibility may persist until your health condition improves or you demonstrate it won’t create excessive demand on Canadian services. Security-related inadmissibility can be permanent. A lawyer can review your specific situation and explain applicable timelines.

A TRP allows someone who is otherwise inadmissible to enter Canada temporarily for a specific purpose. It’s commonly used for urgent situations like attending funerals, important business meetings, or family emergencies. TRPs don’t permanently resolve inadmissibility—they provide temporary exceptions while you remain technically inadmissible. Permits can be issued for single entries or multiple entries over up to three years. Immigration officers assess whether your need to enter Canada justifies allowing entry despite your inadmissibility.

While legal representation isn’t mandatory, hiring a lawyer substantially increases your success rate for overcoming inadmissibility. Immigration lawyers understand the technical requirements of TRP and rehabilitation applications, know how to present persuasive arguments to IRCC, and can identify procedural errors that may have affected your initial refusal. They also prevent critical mistakes that could permanently damage your immigration prospects. Given the complexity of Canadian immigration law, professional legal guidance provides significant advantages.

Legal fees vary based on your case’s complexity and the remedy you’re pursuing. Temporary Resident Permit applications typically involve less extensive preparation than Criminal Rehabilitation cases, which require gathering comprehensive documentation and preparing detailed legal submissions. Factors affecting cost include the number of convictions, whether you need document translation, and whether litigation becomes necessary. Government filing fees are additional. Schedule a consultation to receive a detailed fee estimate based on your specific circumstances and inadmissibility issues.